Monday, 4 January 2010

Why Britain needs a re-brand

British people don't care about the UK any more. The era of national pride has passed and all that is left is a divided, self-interested populous with more loyalty to celebrities and brands than to British people.


I know this because I am one.

Over the past decade, for this is all I can talk knowledgeably about, Britain has become a fragmented state. We have experienced quasi-devolution whereby Wales and Scotland have their own parliaments but still kowtow to Westminster, leading to further anti-British fervour. We have seen a breakdown in society where communities are so transient, especially prevalent in cities, that neighbours don't know each other's names - nevermind actually communicating with each other.

In a society where the crowd is this disparate, without any common bonds, how can we expect to rise and rage against the tide of anti-social behaviour that exists in every nook and cranny? You might argue that anti-social behaviour isn't that rife but think; how many times have you been forced to listen to someone else's music because they didn't think to check whether it was audible; how many times have you seen the elderly stranded in tube carriages because no-one will move; how many times everyday do you see people queue jump, push in front or just show disinterest in the needs and well-being of others?

These minor offences happen all the time and yet each unchecked incident of anti-social behaviour erodes the commonly held values of the masses. If teenagers, children and even middle-aged bankers learn that they will not be pilloried for focusing on themselves to the detriment of others, it reduces their sense of shame. What's more every observer to that act feels more alone by the failure of a cohesive response to it, leading to fear that will harden into anger and disinterest.

So back to the main thrust of this piece, why does Britain need a 're-brand' of all things? A brand is what? A brand is a distinguishing name and/or symbol, intended to identify a product Well, I guess we have the brand but it represents an undefined product. What is it that Britain represents to you? Leave me a comment if you can think of anything positive that represents every head of populous but after ten minutes I'm still stumped.

What is Britain other than a collection of individuals tied together by mutually held - or in years gone by - enforced beliefs? Imagine if a company tried to separate itself into three divisions and each one was allowed to create its own mission statement independent of each of the others. Very soon you would have three companies with no evidence to ever suggest that they were once part of a whole. This is the situation in Britain except the divisions are smaller, sometimes to the level of individuals.

How about instead we act and create a consensus of the small, relatively inconsequential values that we all would like to adhere to, for example something as small as "always give up your seat for those more infirm or in need than yourself". These ideologies would stray away from matters of faith or creed and focus on the day to day. Each time that a citizen wanted to apply for a driving licence, National Insurance, benefit payment or passport they would be required to sign up to these basic values. Any transgression would result in suspension of the use of any and all of those items, empowering people to try to enforce them.

The benefits would be multiple. People would feel empowered to stand up against anti-social behaviour and the shoots of anarchic behaviour would be cut down by the crowd. The best thing is that it does nothing to stifle revolution or kowtow to policy, it just says that there is something powerful and beautiful in this random assortment of people. FFS let's just all be nice to one another!

5 comments:

Dom said...

I hate to disagree with you Mark but I don't think you're quite right. Firstly I totally disagree that traditional British values still exist, too much water has travelled under the bridge since Maggie's famous, "no such thing as society" comment. I've come to the sad conclusion that my values place me largely in a minority, it sounds a tad overblown but it's true. With such badly managed integration of cultures and the breakdown of the family unit, manners fall by the wayside.

Secondly, I don't think people should be celebrated for demonstrating these values. It's like celebrating a mother for feeding her child. There should be an expectation that these values will be adhered to as an absolute minimum, otherwise they become optional.

Thirdly, I totally agree but surely we become far more powerful as an electorate when we lead the way. It sets a higher expectation for those we elevate to power. Also when the country has a common bond they'll be less need for gimmicky political inventions like ASBOs and more time for dealing with serious issues.

Finally, I am a good man aren't I? Thanks for noticing.

ebtwopointzero said...

Great post. Thought I'd add my thoughts to the mix here: Broken Britain or next evolutionary step?

Chris Lee said...

funny you should mention Thatcher, Dom. She's responsible for a great deal of the social problems today - destroyed entire communities and bred mass unemployment with the destruction of blue-collar jobs etc...

"Britain", however, is not broken on the whole - I see a real split between town and country. The London-based media and politicians only see London. Alas, the majority of our tourists only see London too and leave asking why English/British people are so rude. If they travelled to the shires once in a while they would have a different experience. I am from Kent (just 30 miles from London) and we always thank bus drivers and acknowledge drivers when they've let you pass etc - the little things.

There'll always be room for improvement and while there are people out there like you caring enough to blog about it I'm sure it'll be OK.

Dom Whitehurst said...

Thanks Chris, Eb, I have thought long and hard about the post and the reaction to it and I think maybe a clarification/rethink is in order.

I really appreciate all of your feedback. I'll draft something now.

Craig McGill said...

Dom, there never really has been a Britain. It's a concept that exists for Englishmen and Ulstermen and very few others. Even those in Scotland who are pro-union readily admit that very often Britishness comes across as being Englishness more than anything else - in part because England is the dominant country in the trading agreement that is the United Kingdom.

Britain may need a rebrand, but it may be that up until now the media was able to portray one image of the UK as it was able to use it's London-centric bias to portray what they saw outside their window as a believed UK norm - but now with the multiple communication streams we are seeing what there always was, a diverse set of countries and regions which always existed but was ignored by London.

Not so much a rebrand as getting in touch with reality then.

Related Posts with Thumbnails